|
Chapter One:
The
Mystical Body Prefigured in the Old Testament

I.
The incorporation of mankind in Christ
is, before all else, a work of unity: unity of all men
with God, unity of all men among themselves, and this
unity is brought about by the union of all men with
Christ. It is under this aspect of unity that the
Mystical Body appears in its very origins and in the
first documents that speak of it.
These documents are the most ancient
books of Scripture, the writings of the Old Testament.
We shall begin our study with them. However, the
Scripture itself warns us that in order clearly to
understand the Old Testament, we need the light shed
upon it by the New. Novum in vetere latet, vetus in
novo patet, as theologians say, “the new is hidden
in the old, the old is revealed in the new.”
We shall, therefore, follow this detour,
or rather, this only way; it will give us a
comprehensive view of our horizons. Nor is it long; in
order to determine the proper point of view, we need but
read and reflect upon two passages of St. Paul which
furnish the theological introduction to our study of the
Old Testament.
The first of these passages is the
prologue of the Epistle to the Ephesians; we learn that
from the creation of the world, that is, from the moment
that God’s plan concerning the finite was put into
operation, there was already question of the Mystical
Body.
The Apostle may have been thinking of certain errors
which were being propagated in Asia Minor, and which,
with their genealogies of angels and of eons, and their
precepts respecting the use of material creatures,
doubtless embodied a doctrine on the origin of the
physical world, or creation. At all events, in writing
to these churches, Paul considers it necessary to
explain at once the Christian concept of creation.
As far as we can judge, he places
himself at the instans rationis when God foresaw
original sin, and he tells us what was then God’s will
concerning our race. Now, insists Paul, what God willed
was not to create a purely natural humankind in a
profane world, but to raise up a race of men that should
be blessed, chosen and beloved in Christ; in other
words, a race that should be incorporated into the
Mystical Body.
The manner of being, therefore, that God
willed for man was an esse in Christo, an
existence in Christ. Human ontology, viewed in its
origins, was in reality a supernatural ontology, an
ontology of members destined to be joined together in a
body; we have existence in order that we may become
members of the Saviour.
Thus, even the creation of the world speaks to us of
grace; it speaks of a union with God which is offered to
us; it speaks of Christ, Head and Body. Filled with
wonder at this spectacle, Paul opens his Epistle with a
song of thanksgiving.
Paul, an apostle of
Christ Jesus by the will of God, to the saints that are
at Ephesus, the faithful in Christ Jesus: grace to you
and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ.
And the hymn breaks forth
immediately:
Blessed be the God
and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath blessed us
with every spiritual blessing on high in Christ. Yea, in
Him He singles us out before the foundation of the
world, that we might be holy and blameless in His sight.
In love He predestinated us to be adopted as His sons
through Jesus Christ, according to the good pleasure of
His will. (1)
Creation is for Paul so
intrinsically Christian that he returns again to
this loving design, conceived by God before the
foundation of the world. For from the very beginning
Christ is the term and center of all; all things were
created in Him, and all subsist in Him.
The role of Christ, and the concept of
the Mystical Body that follows from it, are at once
cosmological and ecclesiological. That which makes
Christ the first-born of every creature, explains Paul,
likewise makes Him Head of the whole Church; He is the
supernatural unity of all creation, as He is the unity
of the supernatural work which was God’s purpose in
creation. We shall frequently meet with these two
concepts in the course of our study; hence the need of
drawing attention thus early to their close solidarity.
Here, we are at the very foundations of
the doctrine, What the first verse of Genesis is for a
religious understanding of the universe: “In the
beginning God created heaven and earth”; and what the
prologue of St. John’s Gospel is for an understanding of
the Word: “in the beginning was the Word”---these
opening lines of the Epistle to the Ephesians are for
the doctrine of our elevation to the supernatural order
and our incorporation into Christ. They tell us that
God, who in the beginning made all things, loved us, at
the beginning of all His graces, in the Word, who was in
the beginning.
Just as in God there is a pre-existence
of Christ in relation to the Incarnation and creation,
so there is in Christ a pre-existence of the Mystical
Body in relation to all things that are created: the two
are inseparable. So, too, as soon as the unity of the
Christians begins to appear in the Old Testament, and
still more when it reaches its consummation at the end
of time, that unity does not so much rise from earth as
it descends from heaven, where, in a certain sense, it
is realized in advance. In the Apocalypse, St. John sees
it coming down from heaven: it is the new Jerusalem that
comes, adorned as a bride; and this heavenly Jerusalem,
St. Paul assures us, is our Mother. As the streams that
flow upon the earth have their prime source in the
clouds of heaven, so the Church, by which we live here
below, has her beginning in the glory of eternity, in
Jesus Christ.
After the eternal decrees---if we may
employ the term after for what is eternal---after
these decrees, came the fulfillment. God created man,
and Adam was the preparation and the figure of the
Man-God who was to come.
This point merits special attention. The
parallel of the two Adams was already pointed out by St.
Paul, and the idea was destined to become familiar to
Tradition. As a matter of fact, it is expressed by the
simple representation of the skull at the foot of nearly
every crucifix.
It is important to note that in this
parallel the Christ who is compared with Adam is not an
isolated individual, but one who possesses within
Himself the life of regenerated humanity; in other
words, it is the Mystical Christ. The comparison
signifies, therefore, that the inclusion of men in their
first father was the prototype and the figure of their
incorporation in the one Saviour.
Adam forfeited the divine gift both for
himself and for us. But this defection had been
foreseen, and God’s plan continued to work itself out in
spite of us, as it were. However, in our race,
henceforth laden with sin, the full realization of the
divine plan would come but slowly, amid sufferings which
our nature would not have known but for sin.
This realization of the design of God is
related in the books of the Old Testament. But, we must
repeat: even here the message can be read clearly only
in the light of the New Testament. Once more Paul is
God’s interpreter.
We find the explanation in the Epistle
to the Galatians. Certain Jews had come into the young
Church, and were sowing the seeds of alarm. They
maintained that the promises made by God in the Old Law
were for the Jews alone, and that Christians were
excluded unless they submitted to circumcision.
As if God were not already thinking both
of His Son who was to come upon the earth and of those
whom He would make members of His Son, when He made the
Old Covenant! To reassure the Christians, the Mystical
Body of Christ, Paul shows that they were already
referred to in the Old Testament.
The Scripture foresaw
that it was through faith that God would justify the
Gentiles and foretold to Abraham, ‘in thee shall all the
nations be blessed.’ And so they that are of faith are
blessed with faithful Abraham.
This point required more
conclusive proof. Note Paul’s argument:
Brethren, I speak in
human terms. Still, when a man’s will hath been
ratified, no one maketh it void or addeth thereto. Now
the promises were spoken to Abraham ‘and to his seed’.
It saith not, ‘and to his seeds’, as though there were
many, but as of one, ‘and to his seed’; which seed is
Christ. (2)
The will or testament to
which St. Paul alludes does not consist
exclusively in the compact which God had made with
Abraham; it appears to embrace all the promises given by
Yahweh to His people. In other words, it is the entire
Old Testament. In fact, it was the whole of the Old
Testament that constituted Israel’s greatness; hence, it
would seem that the Jewish zealots were using the entire
Old Testament as an argument against the Christians. And
it was the Old Testament as a whole that had to be
explained. Accordingly it is to be thought that Paul is
considering here the entire Old Testament in its most
solemn moment; namely, in the promises made to Abraham.
This whole testament, he explains, is
meant for the Christians, for they are the true seed of
Abraham. God made the covenant primarily with Christ,
and they are united with Christ. Is not Christ the term
toward which the whole Law is directed, and to which it
leads the souls of men, by its prophecies as well as by
its precepts?
In the Epistle to the Galatians, the
Apostle proves this point with a rapidity that one would
be tempted to call presumptuous, did not the very
abruptness of the argument point to an intuition from
the Holy Spirit who inspired the writer.
The seed of Abraham, Paul declares, is
designated by a word, sperma, which the Scripture
consistently employs in the singular. Therefore this
seed can include but one man; and this one man can be
none other than Christ. Hence it is with Christ, and
with Him alone, that the covenant was made.
But, one may object, the fact that a
certain word is used always in the singular merely
proves that here we have to deal with a peculiar Hebrew
idiom. Granted; but God, who created language together
with all other things, may very well speak to us, if He
so wills, even by means of grammar and the dictionary.
If He tells us that He was thinking of a certain
thing---no matter how stupendous that thing may be---and
if He chooses in addressing us to use one word rather
than another, and even supervises the formation of that
particular word, He knows it, and we know it too,
because He tells us about it. Or must we say that the
history of words has the right to remain a totally
profane subject?
However, the Apostle does not dwell upon
his argument, but passes immediately to its consequence.
If the sole heir of the promises is Christ, then we,
too, are that heir, since we are in Christ.
These words are full of doctrinal
significance, and we shall have occasion to return to
them when we consider St. Paul’s own teaching on the
Mystical Body. All the Christians, he says, have put on
Christ; they are taken up together in Him; in a mystical
sense, they are He. Therefore the promises were made to
them, as they were made to Him. But they and He, they in
Him, make up the Mystical Body. Consequently, it is to
the Mystical Body that the whole of the Old Testament
leads.
This is a thought dear to the Apostle,
and one that Tradition has been careful not to lose. As
creation is ‘Christian’, so is the Old Testament
‘Christian’. The Mystical Body had its beginning in
Abel, even in Adam, and all the pages of the ancient
alliance tell us how, little by little, it was formed.
This is the principle that must be insisted upon from
the outset: the Old Testament in its entirety is
concerned with Christ alone, and with us in Christ.
Were we dealing with an ordinary book,
such a principle would, of course, be unacceptable; for
how can one hope to find the meaning intended by one
author, in another author who wrote centuries later? The
case of the word seed, sperma, is
striking; have we any right to look for the explanation
of a particular term in a work that appeared some two
thousand years after that term was used?
Certainly not. But the Scripture is no
ordinary book. It is inspired; that is to say, it has
but one principal author, and, when need arises, this
author is always able to complete and explain His
meaning; and further, He remains forever in His Church,
to interpret His own meaning.
Now it is precisely the fact of inspiration that gives
the Scripture its value for us, and makes it competent
to speak of a subject so mysterious as is that of Christ
living in us by grace. Therefore we take the Scripture,
and we intend to study the Scripture, together with the
rays of light which it provides in order to make its
meaning clear. Indeed, without this help it would be
unintelligible.
II.
Now, with the aid of those rays of light
which we have discovered, it remains for us to see how
the Old Testament actually does speak of Christ, and how
it represents that union which even then God was
preparing to establish between man and Himself in His
well-beloved Son.
Alas, we must confess at once that
despite these helps, our findings amount to very little.
To exploit the treasures of the Old Testament would
require an intimate knowledge very difficult to attain
in our day, when scholars are still deep in research,
and a knowledge, too, which we do not claim to possess.
Such a task would also demand much labor and meditation,
which we have preferred to devote to the New Testament.
Vetus in novo patet, “the old is revealed in the
new”. Here, research is more easy and more fruitful;
whatever indications we might with great difficulty have
gleaned from the Law and the Prophets, we find more
clearly and more completely expressed in the New
Testament.
Hence a brief outline will suffice.
Nevertheless, some such outline is necessary, since, in
God’s plan, the Law and the Prophets are an introduction
to the Gospel. We can better understand the nature of
the union which Christians have with one another and
with God in Christ, if we first consider how this union
was prepared.
Now, the preparation for his union, or
rather, its commencement, is the union that God
established through the Old Covenant; first among His
faithful, the children of Abraham, and then between
Himself and all of them. It is of this twofold union
that we shall now speak.
First, then, we have to consider the
union of the faithful among themselves. At the
beginning, the Scripture shows us, those who believe
form but one family. If, later on, they are to become a
people, this people must, nevertheless, remain united
round the same hearth, as it were. In the eyes of God
they are one, one whole, a single inheritance, a single
field. Again, they are one living organism, one
vineyard, according to the Scriptural metaphor.
Let me sing for my Loved One
The song of my Loved One concerning His
vineyard.
My Loved One had a vineyard
On a fertile hill.
…He expected it to yield grapes,
But it yielded wildlings.
…The vineyard of Yahweh of hosts is he
house of Israel,
And the men of Judah are His cherished
plantation.
(3)
The figure of the vineyard is frequent and traditional.
It has even passed from the Old Testament into the New.
For us today Israel is the vineyard of Yahweh, the
vineyard that failed to bring forth fruit, the vineyard
to which God sent His Son in vain; no, not in vain,
because He was done to death. And today, the Church, the
new Israel, considers herself as the vineyard.
Israel, says the Scripture again, is the
flock of Yahweh:
As cattle going down to the valley,
So did the spirit of the Lord lead them.
(4)
The whole people is a sheep that God
loves, a little worn on which He has taken pity. Still
more frequently, Israel is but a single person.
Together, the children of Israel are the bride of
Yahweh; they are the spouse whom He has chosen and
adorned with His gifts.
As the bridegroom rejoices over the
bride,
So shall thy God rejoice over thee.
(5)
Thus saith the Lord of hosts: ‘I am
jealous for Sion with a great jealousy, and with a great
indignation am I jealous for her.’
(6)
The prophet Ezechiel is bid to deliver
this message from Yahweh to Jerusalem:
Thy father was an
Amorrhite, and thy mother a Cethite….Thou wast cast out
upon the face of the earth, in the abjection of thy
soul, in the day that thou wast born….And I passed by
thee, and see thee….I caused thee to multiply as the bud
of the field: and thou didst increase and grow great,
and…wast made exceeding beautiful. (7)
And the allegory continues:
God adorns His bride; but she is faithless.
Jerusalem abandons Yahweh; she forgets the love of her
youth, and gives herself over to the idols of the
nations. So Yahweh forsakes her, punishes her, and
delivers her up to desolation and to ruin. But His wrath
endures only for a time: He returns to recall His
spouse, forever.
For a small moment have I forsaken thee,
But with great mercies will I gather
thee.
In
a moment of indignation have I hid My face a little
while
from thee,
But with everlasting kindness have I had
mercy on thee,
Said the Lord thy Redeemer.
(8)
As He had sworn to Noe, Yahweh swears a
second time:
So have I sworn not to be angry with thee,
And not to rebuke thee.
For the mountains shall be moved,
And the hills shall tremble;
But My mercy shall not depart from thee,
And the covenant of My peace shall not
be moved:
Said the Lord that hath mercy on thee.
(9)
This divine assurance has ever been the
joy of devout souls, first among the Jews, then among
Christians; they have loved to meditate on the Canticle
of Canticles especially, where God declares His tender
affection for humanity, for the Church, for every soul,
and where, in authentic and inspired language, humanity
itself describes the intimate union which it enjoys with
its God:
Let him kiss me with the kiss of his
mouth….
As the lily among thorns, so is my love
among the daughters….
The voice of my Beloved! Behold he
cometh leaping upon the
Mountains….
Come from Libanus, my spouse, come from
Libanus, come….
Thou hast wounded my heart, my sister,
my spouse!
Thou hast wounded my heart with one of
thy eyes.
(10)
Even for Christians, who have some idea
of how dearly God has loved the world, these verses
continue to be a stirring revelation of how intense is
the love of the Lord and how ardent is His desire to be
near His creature, and to be one with it.
Elsewhere the people is considered as a
widow, or again as a fruitful mother who bears Yahweh
many children. We recall the magnificent apostrophe of
Isaias:
Arise, be enlightened, O Jerusalem: for
thy light is come,
And the glory of the Lord is risen upon
thee….
Lift up thy eyes round about, and see:
All these are gathered together, they
are come to thee:
Thy sons shall come from afar,
And thy daughters shall rise up at thy
side.
(11)
Often, too, the Scripture describes the
chosen people as forming but one man, one elect of
Yahweh, a servant. God tells him:
Thou Israel, art My servant,
Jacob whom I have chosen,
The seed of Abraham My friend:
In whom I have taken thee from the ends
of the earth,
And from the remote parts thereof have
called thee,
And said to thee: Thou art My servant.
And I have chosen thee, and have not
cast thee away.
Fear not, for I am with thee:
Turn not aside, for I am thy God.
…Behold all that fight against thee
Shall be confounded and ashamed;
They shall be as nothing,
And the men shall perish that strive
against thee.
….For I am the Lord thy God,
Who take thee by the hand,
And say to thee: Fear not,
I have helped thee.
Fear not, thou worm of Jacob,
You that are dead of Israel:
I have helped thee, saith the Lord,
And thy Redeemer the Holy One of Israel.
(12)
To Yahweh, all the Israelites together
are a son. At times the name “son” is reserved to the
king, as the official representative of the people. But
often it is the people, considered as a whole, that is
the son of Yahweh; Israel is the well beloved, the
nursling, the first-born, the favorite son, and even the
pampered child of God. Yahweh’s love for Him is as
tender as that of a father for his son. Consider, for
instance, the message which Moses is to deliver to the
king of Egypt; the son of Pharaoh will be the hostage
for God’s own son, who is Israel:
Thou shalt say to him:
Thus saith the Lord: Israel is My son, My first born. I
have said to thee: Let My son go, that he may serve Me,
and thou wouldst not let him go: behold I will kill thy
son, thy first-born. (13)
This son is often rebellious.
But so great is God’s love that He cannot
bring Himself to deal severely with him for long. God
always pardons, He always forgets. He leads all the
Israelites back from the exile into which they had been
banished for their sins.
Behold…a great company of them returning
hither.
They shall come with weeping:
And I will bring them back in mercy:
And
I will bring them through the torrents of waters in a
right
way,
And they shall not stumble in it:
For I am a father to Israel,
And Ephraim is My first-born!
(14)
When God hears “Ephraim groaning in
exile”, He fells constrained to recall him:
Surely Ephraim is an honorable son to
Me,
Surely he is a tender child:
For since I spoke of him,
I will still remember him.
Therefore are My bowels troubled for
him:
Pitying I will pity him, saith the Lord.
(15)
Such is the unity of the people that
prefigures the Church. It forms but one, one whole, one
living being, a single man.
II.
Most perfect, too, is the union of this
people with God. We shall now turn our attention to this
second phase. It, too, is a commencement and a figure of
that union which we have, as members of the Mystical
Body, with God. We have already had to speak of it, in
order to show how closely the whole people is joined
together by the grace of God.
The whole people is the tabernacle of
Yahweh. Yahweh dwells therein, so that the Hebrews are,
as it were, a manifestation of Yahweh upon earth. When
the Gentiles see them triumph over their enemies, they
will know that God is in Israel.
Yahweh is one with His people, and He
considers the outrages of which “His son” is the object,
as an offense against Himself. In times of persecution,
the Jews pray Yahweh to remember that their interests
are His own: “Arise o God”, they cry, “judge Thy own
cause”. (16) And Yahweh answers:
Behold I will judge thy cause,
And I will take vengeance for thee.
(17)
Israel’s cause is indeed the cause of
Yahweh, and he that lays hand on Israel, wounds Him in
the apple of His eye. This Edom and Moab will one day
come to realize: by insulting Israel, they insult God
Himself. He will come to take up the challenge; He will
enter into judgment with the nations on behalf of His
own people and His inheritance. Then they shall see that
He, Yahweh, has heard the taunts that were uttered
against the mountains of Israel, and they shall
understand that in so doing they were defying Yahweh
Himself.
Because Moab and Seir have said:
Behold the house of Juda is like all
other nations:
Therefore behold I will open the
shoulder of Moab.
(18)
When He avenges His people, it is His own honor that
Yahweh will restore:
For I have spoken it, saith the Lord
God.
And I will send a fire on Magog,
And on them that dwell confidently in
the islands:
And they shall know that I am the Lord.
And I will make My holy name known
In the midst of My people Israel,
And My holy name shall be profaned no
more;
And the Gentiles shall know that I am
the Lord, the Holy one
of Israel.
….Now will I bring back the captivity of
Jacob,
And will have mercy on all the house of
Israel:
And I will be jealous for My holy name.
This solidarity is not to be something
purely extrinsic. Israel has more than an alliance with
Yahweh; Israel is like unto Yahweh, because he is His
son and because a son is like unto his father. As Yahweh
is a God different from all others, or rather, as He is
the only God, and holy God, so too Israel is a nation
apart, a holy nation. This the Law reiterates
unceasingly:
I am the Lord your
God: be holy because I am holy. Defile not your souls by
any creeping thing, that moveth upon the earth. For I am
the Lord, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, that
I might be your God. You shall be holy, because I am
holy. (20)
This holiness refers
primarily to the absence of any juridical defect,
but according to the teaching of both the Law and the
Prophets, it also means holiness of soul.
Moreover, by this holiness the whole
people becomes an image and a figure of the Holy One of
God that is to come. As St. Paul and constant Tradition
affirm, the Old Covenant in its entirety is an immense
symbol, and the virtues that adorn it, the precepts it
contains, even the deeds it records, have the mission to
prefigure Christ and those that are Christ’s.
To search out and to develop this
symbolism of the Old Testament would be a long process;
we must be content with having mentioned its existence.
It explains that the entire Old Law is the beginning of
a plan, of a reality, of a mystery, and that this is the
mystery of Christ, coming to live in His own.
Of this we have given some indication;
little enough, it is true. Much more might have been
said. However, all that we could say would seem but
little. For, were one to consider the Old Testament
independently and to judge from outward appearances
only, might he not say that the ideal of unity which it
expresses---union with God, union of all the Hebrews
among themselves---differs very little from the ideal of
unity to which every people aspires?
But this is precisely the point we wish
to stress: the Old Testament cannot be taken alone. It
is but the beginning of a message, and only the
remainder of the message can give that beginning its
true significance.
1.
Eph. 1:1-5.
2.
Gal. 3:8, 9, 15, 16.
3.
Isa. 5:1 ff (Private translation).
4.
Isa. 63: 14 (Private translation).
5.
Isa. 62:5 (Private translation).
6.
Zach. 8:2 (Private translation).
7.
Ezech. 16:3, 5, 8, 7, 13.
8.
Isa. 54:7 ff.
9. Ibid.
10.
Cant. 1:1; 2:2, 8; 4:8, 9.
11.
Isa. 60: 1, 4.
12.
Isa. 41: 8-14.
13.
Exod. 4: 22, 23.
14.
Jer. 31: 8, 9.
15.
Jer. 31:20.
16.
Ps. 73: 22.
17.
Jer. 51: 36.
18.
Ezech. 25: 8, 9.
19.
Ezech. 39: 6, 7, 25.
20.
Levit. 11: 44-46.

• Up • The Whole Christ (Introduction) • The Whole Christ: Chapter One • The Whole Christ: Chapter Two • The Whole Christ: Chapter Three • The Whole Christ: Chapter Four • The Whole Christ: Chapter Five • The Whole Christ: Chapter Six • The Whole Christ: Chapter Seven •
 |